Site Home   Archive Home   FAQ Home   How to search the Archive   How to Navigate the Archive   
Compare FPGA features and resources   

Threads starting:
1994JulAugSepOctNovDec1994
1995JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec1995
1996JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec1996
1997JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec1997
1998JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec1998
1999JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec1999
2000JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec2000
2001JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec2001
2002JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec2002
2003JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec2003
2004JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec2004
2005JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec2005
2006JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec2006
2007JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec2007
2008JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec2008
2009JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec2009
2010JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec2010
2011JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec2011
2012JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec2012
2013JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec2013
2014JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec2014
2015JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec2015
2016JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec2016
2017JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec2017
2018JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec2018
2019JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec2019
2020JanFebMarAprMay2020

Authors:A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z

Custom Search

Messages from 153575

Article: 153575
Subject: Re: Spartan 3A counter speed ?
From: Jon Elson <jmelson@wustl.edu>
Date: Fri, 30 Mar 2012 14:15:05 -0500
Links: << >>  << T >>  << A >>
glen herrmannsfeldt wrote:


> Well, also it depends on how you use the counter. If you need to be
> able to latch the bits from the counter, then the timing might
> depend on that, and not the counter itself. (In race terms, to be
> able to get lap times while the counter continues to run.)
Yes, this is part of the design.  I guess one needs to make a constraint
so that the counter latches get a coherent sample.  I'm thinking I should
synchronize the external clock for each counter to a 150 MHz internal clock,
and use a clock edge detector in the external clock domain to activate the
clock enable of the counter on the internal clock.

Thanks

Jon

Article: 153576
Subject: Re: Spartan 3A counter speed ?
From: glen herrmannsfeldt <gah@ugcs.caltech.edu>
Date: Fri, 30 Mar 2012 19:16:28 +0000 (UTC)
Links: << >>  << T >>  << A >>
Jon Elson <jmelson@wustl.edu> wrote:

(snip, I wrote)
>> Well, also it depends on how you use the counter. If you need to be
>> able to latch the bits from the counter, then the timing might
>> depend on that, and not the counter itself. (In race terms, to be
>> able to get lap times while the counter continues to run.)

> Yes, this is part of the design.  I guess one needs to make a 
> constraint so that the counter latches get a coherent sample.  

Without that constraint, you might get to 300MHz or so.

If S3A isn't so different from S3E, 100MHz shouldn't be so
hard with the latch.

> I'm thinking I should synchronize the external clock for each 
> counter to a 150 MHz internal clock, and use a clock edge 
> detector in the external clock domain to activate the clock 
> enable of the counter on the internal clock.

I think that sounds right.

You have to meet the setup and hold times for the latch.

-- glen

Article: 153577
Subject: Re: Spartan 3A counter speed ?
From: nico@puntnl.niks (Nico Coesel)
Date: Fri, 30 Mar 2012 21:11:40 GMT
Links: << >>  << T >>  << A >>
Rob Gaddi <rgaddi@technologyhighland.invalid> wrote:

>On Mon, 26 Mar 2012 14:33:33 -0500
>Jon Elson <jmelson@wustl.edu> wrote:
>
>> Thanks, that's as close to a non-answer as you can get.  The tricky
>> part is the carry chain for long counters, and they really don't
>> give you much info there, unless there's a secret manual I have
>> not been able to find.
>> 
>> Jon
>
>If I recall correctly, carry chain propagation was on the order of 700
>ps/2 bits, but don't quote me on that.
>
>Part of the problem is that I don't think your question is answerable
>in the general case of "Spartan 3A".  Different device sizes may or may
>not allow you to run 32-bits all on one carry chain.  If you have to
>use two columns instead of just one, the additional performance hit of
>that next bit would be substantial.

Maybe but you could divide the counter in two (or more) parts. Have
the second counter run on a delayed carry chain. By using registers to
delay the output of the first counter you can align the output results
of the counters.

-- 
Failure does not prove something is impossible, failure simply
indicates you are not using the right tools...
nico@nctdevpuntnl (punt=.)
--------------------------------------------------------------

Article: 153578
Subject: Could you explain these speed spec to me?
From: fl <rxjwg98@gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 31 Mar 2012 20:19:59 -0700 (PDT)
Links: << >>  << T >>  << A >>
Hi,
I get the following data from a on-line slide on MAP decoder. I think
"Speed" is about the max clock rate. How about the "Fastest
Implementation"? Could you explain it to me?

Thanks.




............
Synthesis
=95Synopsys
=95Area: 0.96 mm2
=95Speed: 150 MHz
=95Fastest Implementation: 110MHz

Article: 153579
Subject: Low latency FPGA options
From: Jordan Fix <jfix71@gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 31 Mar 2012 23:14:38 -0700 (PDT)
Links: << >>  << T >>  << A >>
Hello,

I am looking to use FPGA's as specialized coprocessors to increase
performance on different applications. I would like the lowest latency
possible to memory. I have only found options with PCIE and
HyperTransport, but I was hoping to find something similar to this
which I assume would have lower latency than PCIE or HyperTransport:
( http://www.nallatech.com/intel-xeon-fsb-fpga-socket-fillers.html ).
However it seems that product is no longer in production.

Are there any similar products to the above link? I suppose a related
question is, how much lower latency would there be for an FPGA on the
FSB instead of PCIE or HyperTransport?

Thanks,
Jordan

Article: 153580
Subject: Re: FPGA + Mess o' RAM
From: Michael S <already5chosen@yahoo.com>
Date: Sun, 1 Apr 2012 09:52:06 -0700 (PDT)
Links: << >>  << T >>  << A >>
On Mar 27, 12:19=A0am, Rob Gaddi <rga...@technologyhighland.invalid>
wrote:
> Does anyone have any experience connecting an FPGA to a serious mess of
> DRAM? =A0I'm thinking of something on the order of 16GB, possibly
> just by buying/socketing 4x4GB standard DIMMs.
>
> I don't need tremendous throughput; if I could average 50 MB/s I'd be
> fine. =A0For sheer density I'm thinking DDR2. =A0I'd like to avoid DDR3 i=
f
> I can, simply because of the lack of support on low-end FPGAs. I could
> certainly go slower, say DDR1 or even SDR, but that seems to imply
> buying chips by the bucketload per board, and my assembly people will
> shoot me.
>
> Ideally this would be a Cyclone 3/4 project. =A0Maybe Spartan 6 instead.
> The actual signal processing requirements are low, so I don't need that
> much crunching horsepower.
>
> Anyone manage to do something like this?
>
> --
> Rob Gaddi, Highland Technology --www.highlandtechnology.com
> Email address domain is currently out of order. =A0See above to fix.

I don't believe that you will find low end FPGA that officially
supports such amount of RAM.
May be, mid range, like Arria GZ, but even then, it seems to support
ether 1 DDR3 DIMM per channel or 2 DDR2 DIMMs, so hitting 16 GB
wouldn't be easy.

On the other hand you can relatively easily connect 2x8GB DDR3 DIMMs
to smallest Stratix3 or Stratix4.

There is another interesting option - do it backward!
 I mean, build PCIe board around Cyclone-4 GX and let host PC to serve
as your memory controller. Plugging 24 GB into PC nowadays is cheap,
easy and reliable. The latency over PCIe will be ~5 times higher than
via direct connection, but you will get plenty of bandwidth, something
around 150 MB/s for x1 gen1 link.


Article: 153581
Subject: Re: Low latency FPGA options
From: John Adair <g1@enterpoint.co.uk>
Date: Sun, 1 Apr 2012 10:01:39 -0700 (PDT)
Links: << >>  << T >>  << A >>
Jordan

There were 2 or 3 companies manufacturing accelerators that were aimed
at sitting in a second processor socket. For companies that have used
this technique the problems of keeping up with socket changes was
always going to be a problem. The other problem is that the second
socket on most motherboards, and maybe all, has dissappeared. Main
reason for that is multi-core processors that don't need 2+ sockets.

PCIe latency can be a big factor if you doing a HPC system that only
does "small" commands, instructions or functions because the PCIe
latency costs you much more than you gain. "Big" commands,
instructions, or functions are usually ok. Chained systems or systems
where the processor is only a manager usually work well. That's why in
our HPC systems, using our Merrick and Broaddown family boards, we
make features like 1G and 10G Ethernet directly available to these
boards that cuts out the PCIe structure.Similarly we now do real world
sensor interfacing for these systems through our Lamachan2 board so
there is minimal latency.

There are usually other ways to tackle most problems but it depends on
what you need to achieve. Here we do a lot of different things
depending on a customer system requirements and rarely is the same
approach used for any 2 customers.

John Adair
Enterpoint Ltd. - Home of FPGA HPC systems.

On Apr 1, 7:14=A0am, Jordan Fix <jfi...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I am looking to use FPGA's as specialized coprocessors to increase
> performance on different applications. I would like the lowest latency
> possible to memory. I have only found options with PCIE and
> HyperTransport, but I was hoping to find something similar to this
> which I assume would have lower latency than PCIE or HyperTransport:
> (http://www.nallatech.com/intel-xeon-fsb-fpga-socket-fillers.html).
> However it seems that product is no longer in production.
>
> Are there any similar products to the above link? I suppose a related
> question is, how much lower latency would there be for an FPGA on the
> FSB instead of PCIE or HyperTransport?
>
> Thanks,
> Jordan


Article: 153582
Subject: Re: Low latency FPGA options
From: Michael S <already5chosen@yahoo.com>
Date: Sun, 1 Apr 2012 10:27:51 -0700 (PDT)
Links: << >>  << T >>  << A >>
On Apr 1, 9:14=A0am, Jordan Fix <jfi...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I am looking to use FPGA's as specialized coprocessors to increase
> performance on different applications. I would like the lowest latency
> possible to memory. I have only found options with PCIE and
> HyperTransport, but I was hoping to find something similar to this
> which I assume would have lower latency than PCIE or HyperTransport:
> (http://www.nallatech.com/intel-xeon-fsb-fpga-socket-fillers.html).
> However it seems that product is no longer in production.
>
> Are there any similar products to the above link? I suppose a related
> question is, how much lower latency would there be for an FPGA on the
> FSB instead of PCIE or HyperTransport?
>
> Thanks,
> Jordan

Intel AGTL+ FSB is dead and buried. Also, I am not sure that even when
it was alive the latency was really lower than HyperTransport.
AMD HTX slots also close to non-existent.
Intel QPI made short appearance in the desktops but was quickly killed
by more integrated solutions and, by now, exists only in servers.
Besides, QPI is not very narrow source synchronous parallel bus that,
in its latest incarnation, runs at 6.4-8.0 GT/s. I.e. even the most
modern FPGA will have very hard time talking to it :(

Overall, low latency off-chip co-processors look like technological
dead end. Sorry.
You better start looking for a way to live with relatively high
latency of PCIe interface.


Article: 153583
Subject: Re: Could you explain these speed spec to me?
From: Mawa_fugo <ccon67@netscape.net>
Date: Mon, 2 Apr 2012 13:50:55 -0700 (PDT)
Links: << >>  << T >>  << A >>
On Mar 31, 10:19=A0pm, fl <rxjw...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi,
> I get the following data from a on-line slide on MAP decoder. I think
> "Speed" is about the max clock rate. How about the "Fastest
> Implementation"? Could you explain it to me?
>
> Thanks.
>
> ............
> Synthesis
> =95Synopsys
> =95Area: 0.96 mm2
> =95Speed: 150 MHz
> =95Fastest Implementation: 110MHz

Sound like a local route from A to B allows you to do 150 mph,
but the highway system would limit to 110 mph

So 110 is the number to take into your calculation... while 150 is
just for fun !? or at least it tells you go to fix your highway if you
want faster speed, and do not dig up you local routes


Article: 153584
Subject: Re: Ball-park price of Xilinx Virtex 7 FPGA?
From: Uwe Bonnes <bon@elektron.ikp.physik.tu-darmstadt.de>
Date: Mon, 2 Apr 2012 22:35:14 +0000 (UTC)
Links: << >>  << T >>  << A >>
Elam <elampooranan@gmail.com> wrote:

> I understand that the price depends on the volume etc
> but I would like to know the per unit price of Virtex 7 FPGA..

> Any guesses..

Search for XC7V on www.findchips.com.

And better sit down before checking...

Bye
-- 
Uwe Bonnes                bon@elektron.ikp.physik.tu-darmstadt.de

Institut fuer Kernphysik  Schlossgartenstrasse 9  64289 Darmstadt
--------- Tel. 06151 162516 -------- Fax. 06151 164321 ----------

Article: 153585
Subject: Re: Low latency FPGA options
From: glen herrmannsfeldt <gah@ugcs.caltech.edu>
Date: Mon, 2 Apr 2012 23:46:12 +0000 (UTC)
Links: << >>  << T >>  << A >>
Jordan Fix <jfix71@gmail.com> wrote:

> I am looking to use FPGA's as specialized coprocessors to increase
> performance on different applications. I would like the lowest latency
> possible to memory. 

Sometimes you can't live without low latency, but reasonably
often you can do it pipelined. That might mean doing two or three
of whatever you are doing instead of one, using separate data
streams.

-- glen

Article: 153586
Subject: Re: Ball-park price of Xilinx Virtex 7 FPGA?
From: Ed McGettigan <ed.mcgettigan@xilinx.com>
Date: Mon, 2 Apr 2012 16:55:48 -0700 (PDT)
Links: << >>  << T >>  << A >>
On Mar 28, 10:31=A0am, Elam <elampoora...@gmail.com> wrote:
> I understand that the price depends on the volume etc
> but I would like to know the per unit price of Virtex 7 FPGA..
>
> Any guesses..
>
> Thanks
> Elam.

There are too many variables (device, package, speed grade, volume,
delivery date, etc..) involved in pricing for any simple answer.
Contact your local Xilinx sales rep and they would be happy to sit
down and discuss your needs and come up with the right pricing that
matches your situation.
http://www.xilinx.com/company/contact/sales-reps.htm

Using online pricing data for 1-10 parts today will not be reflective
of 1K-10K pricing 18 months from now.

Ed McGettigan
--
Xilinx Inc.

Article: 153587
Subject: Expectations from newly minted EE?
From: "MikeWhy" <boat042-nospam@yahoo.com>
Date: Tue, 3 Apr 2012 01:24:33 -0500
Links: << >>  << T >>  << A >>
Fellas, I work in a historically software only industry, but have a project 
on my desk that would likely benefit from implementation on recent 
generation FPGA. My HDL skills are scant and ancient, and it's almost 
certain any recent BsEE can do a better, faster job of it than I can. The 
problem is relatively simple: read messages off a UDP or TCP socket; 
identify the key message fields; discard or process the message based on the 
field contents; generate and push one or more TCP messages out another 
network. The performance goal is to reduce latency from receipt to 
transmission.

What level of knowledge and expertise can I expect from recent graduates on 
their first job? How much, or little, on job experience would you expect to 
be minimal to complete this project successfully? How much project 
responsibility can I reasonably assign them? How much specific technical 
knowledge will I need to run this project successfully?

Thanks.


Article: 153588
Subject: Re: Expectations from newly minted EE?
From: MK <mk@nospam.co.uk>
Date: Tue, 03 Apr 2012 08:32:46 +0100
Links: << >>  << T >>  << A >>
On 03/04/2012 07:24, MikeWhy wrote:
> Fellas, I work in a historically software only industry, but have a
> project on my desk that would likely benefit from implementation on
> recent generation FPGA. My HDL skills are scant and ancient, and it's
> almost certain any recent BsEE can do a better, faster job of it than I
> can. The problem is relatively simple: read messages off a UDP or TCP
> socket; identify the key message fields; discard or process the message
> based on the field contents; generate and push one or more TCP messages
> out another network. The performance goal is to reduce latency from
> receipt to transmission.
>
> What level of knowledge and expertise can I expect from recent graduates
> on their first job? How much, or little, on job experience would you
> expect to be minimal to complete this project successfully? How much
> project responsibility can I reasonably assign them? How much specific
> technical knowledge will I need to run this project successfully?
>
> Thanks.
>
The task you describe would normally be coded on some kind of processor, 
which could be implemented in FPGA although you don't give quite enough 
info. to be sure ("reduce latency" needs numbers !)
If there are some constraints of performance which require that the 
TCP/IP stack should be implemented in the FPGA as logic described in an 
HDL then you'll need a damn good recent graduate.
You would do far better to get someone in on contract with some 
proveable experience.
I've done soem fairly slick (although I say it myself) UDP handling in 
VHDL and its hard work.

Michael Kellett


Article: 153589
Subject: Re: Ball-park price of Xilinx Virtex 7 FPGA?
From: Uwe Bonnes <bon@elektron.ikp.physik.tu-darmstadt.de>
Date: Tue, 3 Apr 2012 08:37:07 +0000 (UTC)
Links: << >>  << T >>  << A >>
Uwe Bonnes <bon@elektron.ikp.physik.tu-darmstadt.de> wrote:
> Elam <elampooranan@gmail.com> wrote:

> > I understand that the price depends on the volume etc
> > but I would like to know the per unit price of Virtex 7 FPGA..

> > Any guesses..

> Search for XC7V on www.findchips.com.

No online availability for now. Prices last time I checked was up to 50 k$...

Bye
-- 
Uwe Bonnes                bon@elektron.ikp.physik.tu-darmstadt.de

Institut fuer Kernphysik  Schlossgartenstrasse 9  64289 Darmstadt
--------- Tel. 06151 162516 -------- Fax. 06151 164321 ----------

Article: 153590
Subject: Re: Expectations from newly minted EE?
From: "MikeWhy" <boat042-nospam@yahoo.com>
Date: Tue, 3 Apr 2012 05:19:43 -0500
Links: << >>  << T >>  << A >>
"MK" <mk@nospam.co.uk> wrote in message 
news:ScCdnWNgw4kCOufSnZ2dnUVZ8tadnZ2d@bt.com...
> On 03/04/2012 07:24, MikeWhy wrote:
>> Fellas, I work in a historically software only industry, but have a
>> project on my desk that would likely benefit from implementation on
>> recent generation FPGA. My HDL skills are scant and ancient, and it's
>> almost certain any recent BsEE can do a better, faster job of it than I
>> can. The problem is relatively simple: read messages off a UDP or TCP
>> socket; identify the key message fields; discard or process the message
>> based on the field contents; generate and push one or more TCP messages
>> out another network. The performance goal is to reduce latency from
>> receipt to transmission.
>>
>> What level of knowledge and expertise can I expect from recent graduates
>> on their first job? How much, or little, on job experience would you
>> expect to be minimal to complete this project successfully? How much
>> project responsibility can I reasonably assign them? How much specific
>> technical knowledge will I need to run this project successfully?
>>
>> Thanks.
>>
> The task you describe would normally be coded on some kind of processor, 
> which could be implemented in FPGA although you don't give quite enough 
> info. to be sure ("reduce latency" needs numbers !)
> If there are some constraints of performance which require that the TCP/IP 
> stack should be implemented in the FPGA as logic described in an HDL then 
> you'll need a damn good recent graduate.
> You would do far better to get someone in on contract with some proveable 
> experience.
> I've done soem fairly slick (although I say it myself) UDP handling in 
> VHDL and its hard work.

Thanks, Michael.

The desired latency is as close to 0 as possible. No smiley. Software 
implementations exist. The goal is to put them out of business, soundly and 
convincingly. It doesn't need to "win" by a big margin, but it needs to win 
100% of the time. Is 100 ns big or small in your world?

Yes, I see the problem with implementing the TCP stack in HDL. Are there 
commercial IP that do this in FPGA logic? I know it can be done in soft- or 
onboard processors. I think this can be set aside for the moment as an 
integration exercise. Say the bytes magically appaer in block ram, and 
then...

Getting back to reasonable expectations of competency. Can I expect a EE, 
having studied diligently and earned his bachelors, to already know how to 
efficiently find a fixed byte pattern in the first N bytes in a message? Can 
he implement a hash table in FPGA logic? Can he take a file containing 
sample data and create simulation scripts and validate his designs?

Again, my basis for asking is I think I can almost hack my way through this, 
but I know I wouldn't want to hire myself to build this.


Article: 153591
Subject: Re: Expectations from newly minted EE?
From: glen herrmannsfeldt <gah@ugcs.caltech.edu>
Date: Tue, 3 Apr 2012 10:48:17 +0000 (UTC)
Links: << >>  << T >>  << A >>
MikeWhy <boat042-nospam@yahoo.com> wrote:

> Fellas, I work in a historically software only industry, but have 
> a project on my desk that would likely benefit from implementation 
> on recent generation FPGA. My HDL skills are scant and ancient, 
> and it's almost certain any recent BsEE can do a better, faster 
> job of it than I can. 

> The problem is relatively simple: read messages off a UDP or 
> TCP socket; identify the key message fields; discard or process 
> the message based on the field contents; generate and push one 
> or more TCP messages out another network. 

As far as I know, this isn't commonly taught to recent BsEE,
but also isn't so far from what one might know.

Generating UDP packets with a relatively simple state machine
in an FPGA shouldn't be so hard. Accepting them as input just
a little harder. Probably a soft processor (in the FPGA) would
be used to handle ARP.

TCP is a lot harder than UDP, with many more cases to be
considered. It is certainly possible that it has been done
without a processor, but I haven't heard about it being done.

> The performance goal is to reduce latency from receipt to 
> transmission.

That pretty much means UDP. Note that TCP is a stream protocol.
While you can add record marks (there is even an RFC on how to
do it) you usually wouldn't want that if latency was important.

> What level of knowledge and expertise can I expect from recent 
> graduates on their first job? How much, or little, on job 
> experience would you expect to be minimal to complete this 
> project successfully? How much project responsibility can 
> I reasonably assign them? How much specific technical 
> knowledge will I need to run this project successfully?

It is a little complicated by the fact that HDL design
and network protocols are often considered separately.

It would be much easier to find two people, one to do
the HDL design and the other the network protocols.
The rest would be much easier to answer with a little
more detail on the requirements.

-- glen

Article: 153592
Subject: Re: Expectations from newly minted EE?
From: glen herrmannsfeldt <gah@ugcs.caltech.edu>
Date: Tue, 3 Apr 2012 11:04:56 +0000 (UTC)
Links: << >>  << T >>  << A >>
MikeWhy <boat042-nospam@yahoo.com> wrote:

(snip)
> The desired latency is as close to 0 as possible. No smiley. Software 
> implementations exist. The goal is to put them out of business, soundly and 
> convincingly. It doesn't need to "win" by a big margin, but it needs to win 
> 100% of the time. Is 100 ns big or small in your world?

How are you measuring latency? For gigabit ethernet, 100ns 
is 100 bits, or about 12 bytes. I would normally measure from
the beginning of the request coming in to the end of the reply.

10G ethernet exists, but isn't common, and will be much more
difficult to do in an FPGA. In that case, you get 125 bytes,
enough for the ethernet, IP, UDP header and a small amount
of data.

> Yes, I see the problem with implementing the TCP stack in HDL. 
> Are there commercial IP that do this in FPGA logic? 
> I know it can be done in soft- or onboard processors. 
> I think this can be set aside for the moment as an 
> integration exercise. Say the bytes magically appaer in 
> block ram, and then...  

You wand UDP. Note that TCP includes acknowledge and 
retransmit after a time expires. That, in addition to it
being a stream protocol, make is all wrong for this problem.

> Getting back to reasonable expectations of competency. 
> Can I expect a EE, having studied diligently and earned his 
> bachelors, to already know how to efficiently find a fixed 
> byte pattern in the first N bytes in a message? 

Hmm, I suppose a good chance on that one.

> Can he implement a hash table in FPGA logic? Can he take 
> a file containing sample data and create simulation scripts 
> and validate his designs?

Just for lookups, or does it have to add new entries
to the table from the input? 

> Again, my basis for asking is I think I can almost hack my 
> way through this, but I know I wouldn't want to hire 
> myself to build this.

In that case, you should be able to supervise and keep on
track a good BSEE. You will both learn some as the project
progresses, but it should work.

-- glen

Article: 153593
Subject: Re: Expectations from newly minted EE?
From: Tim Wescott <tim@seemywebsite.please>
Date: Tue, 03 Apr 2012 09:56:08 -0500
Links: << >>  << T >>  << A >>
On Tue, 03 Apr 2012 01:24:33 -0500, MikeWhy wrote:

> Fellas, I work in a historically software only industry, but have a
> project on my desk that would likely benefit from implementation on
> recent generation FPGA. My HDL skills are scant and ancient, and it's
> almost certain any recent BsEE can do a better, faster job of it than I
> can. The problem is relatively simple: read messages off a UDP or TCP
> socket; identify the key message fields; discard or process the message
> based on the field contents; generate and push one or more TCP messages
> out another network. The performance goal is to reduce latency from
> receipt to transmission.
> 
> What level of knowledge and expertise can I expect from recent graduates
> on their first job? How much, or little, on job experience would you
> expect to be minimal to complete this project successfully? How much
> project responsibility can I reasonably assign them? How much specific
> technical knowledge will I need to run this project successfully?

Universities don't teach kids how to _do_ -- they build a foundation, on 
which one builds a house by one's own efforts.  So the amount of 
practical ability that a kid will have coming out of college will vary 
dramatically from kid to kid.  Worse, it won't necessarily correlate well 
with grades.  A straight-A student may be completely worthless at 
practical stuff, while a C student may have gotten that way because he 
was spending too much time building working robots (or running a 
business) to keep his grades up.

Hand it off and expect it to get done, to a new EE: maybe a 5% chance of 
success.

Put your heads together with said EE, prop him/her up where they're weak: 
15-35% chance of success.

Given an EE with the proverbial 5 years of experience or equivalent: 70% 
chance of success.

Above, only the experience is at a company that does routers:  95%

A 5-year EE + you: 95%

If you feel you must hire straight out of a University, pay careful 
attention not just to the classes taken, but also to the kid's 
extracurricular activities.  You're looking for someone who's self-
motivated and has done something real.  The ideal candidate (and there 
are a few out there) will have worked as a technician before or during 
college, or will have been an electronics (or robitics) hobbyist, or will 
have done a senior project that actually worked in the end, etc.

By looking for the above, you're going to cut out 90% of the candidates.  
Fortunately, HR people, and even many EE managers, don't understand the 
value of practical application, so you'll be presented with a resource 
that hasn't been picked over yet -- think of it as going prospecting for 
gold with a bunch of people who don't recognize ore, only the native 
material.

Having said that, getting an EE who's already been in the working world 
and done some circuit design of some sort will winnow out all the 
candidates that got through school then found out that they really wanted 
to be in Marketing, or lack necessary working-world skills, etc.

-- 
Tim Wescott
Control system and signal processing consulting
www.wescottdesign.com

Article: 153594
Subject: Mandelbrot set on Spartan3
From: Thorsten Kiefer <thorstenkiefer@gmx.de>
Date: Tue, 03 Apr 2012 17:09:43 +0200
Links: << >>  << T >>  << A >>
Hi,
implemented the Mandelbrot set on Digilent's Starter Kit for Spartan 3.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nohaJJLdfZQ

Is anyone interested in the .bit-file ?

Regards
Thorsten

Article: 153595
Subject: Re: Expectations from newly minted EE?
From: Rob Gaddi <rgaddi@technologyhighland.invalid>
Date: Tue, 3 Apr 2012 08:59:48 -0700
Links: << >>  << T >>  << A >>
On Tue, 3 Apr 2012 05:19:43 -0500
"MikeWhy" <boat042-nospam@yahoo.com> wrote:

> The desired latency is as close to 0 as possible. No smiley. Software 
> implementations exist. The goal is to put them out of business, soundly and 
> convincingly. It doesn't need to "win" by a big margin, but it needs to win 
> 100% of the time. Is 100 ns big or small in your world?
> 
> Yes, I see the problem with implementing the TCP stack in HDL. Are there 
> commercial IP that do this in FPGA logic? I know it can be done in soft- or 
> onboard processors. I think this can be set aside for the moment as an 
> integration exercise. Say the bytes magically appaer in block ram, and 
> then...
> 

I've seen one somewhere, but can't recall where.  The other problem
with TCP is that the latency is pretty unpredictable based on network
conditions.  You might be better off seeing whether you can do
everything UDP, which is much more predictable.

> Getting back to reasonable expectations of competency. Can I expect a EE, 
> having studied diligently and earned his bachelors, to already know how to 
> efficiently find a fixed byte pattern in the first N bytes in a message? Can 
> he implement a hash table in FPGA logic? Can he take a file containing 
> sample data and create simulation scripts and validate his designs?
> 

In my experience, you can expect a newly minted EE to be able to beat
you at beer pong, and tie his shoes correctly 4 days out of 5.
Anything past that he's going to have to learn.

-- 
Rob Gaddi, Highland Technology -- www.highlandtechnology.com
Email address domain is currently out of order.  See above to fix.

Article: 153596
Subject: Re: Expectations from newly minted EE?
From: Joe Chisolm <jchisolm6@earthlink.net>
Date: Tue, 03 Apr 2012 11:04:07 -0500
Links: << >>  << T >>  << A >>
On Tue, 03 Apr 2012 11:04:56 +0000, glen herrmannsfeldt wrote:

> MikeWhy <boat042-nospam@yahoo.com> wrote:
> 
> (snip)
>> The desired latency is as close to 0 as possible. No smiley. Software
>> implementations exist. The goal is to put them out of business, soundly
>> and convincingly. It doesn't need to "win" by a big margin, but it
>> needs to win 100% of the time. Is 100 ns big or small in your world?
> 
> How are you measuring latency? For gigabit ethernet, 100ns is 100 bits,
> or about 12 bytes. I would normally measure from the beginning of the
> request coming in to the end of the reply.
> 
> 10G ethernet exists, but isn't common, and will be much more difficult
> to do in an FPGA. In that case, you get 125 bytes, enough for the
> ethernet, IP, UDP header and a small amount of data.
> 

Actually, 10G is popping up in more and more places, especially in the
big data centers.  Having multiple 10G links on a single device is
is here today.  40G is on the close horizon.  I've seen the design 
for a 40G interface card.

>> Yes, I see the problem with implementing the TCP stack in HDL. Are
>> there commercial IP that do this in FPGA logic? I know it can be done
>> in soft- or onboard processors. I think this can be set aside for the
>> moment as an integration exercise. Say the bytes magically appaer in
>> block ram, and then...
> 
> You wand UDP. Note that TCP includes acknowledge and retransmit after a
> time expires. That, in addition to it being a stream protocol, make is
> all wrong for this problem.
> 

<snip>
The OP should look into a network processor, especially if you are 
trying to do any kind of deep packet inspection.  NPs are built to
do this kind of work.

-- 
Chisolm
Republic Of Texas

Article: 153597
Subject: Re: Expectations from newly minted EE?
From: "MikeWhy" <boat042-nospam@yahoo.com>
Date: Tue, 3 Apr 2012 12:11:41 -0500
Links: << >>  << T >>  << A >>
"glen herrmannsfeldt" <gah@ugcs.caltech.edu> wrote in message 
news:jlelgn$av7$1@speranza.aioe.org...
> MikeWhy <boat042-nospam@yahoo.com> wrote:
>
> (snip)
>> The desired latency is as close to 0 as possible. No smiley. Software
>> implementations exist. The goal is to put them out of business, soundly 
>> and
>> convincingly. It doesn't need to "win" by a big margin, but it needs to 
>> win
>> 100% of the time. Is 100 ns big or small in your world?
>
> How are you measuring latency? For gigabit ethernet, 100ns
> is 100 bits, or about 12 bytes. I would normally measure from
> the beginning of the request coming in to the end of the reply.
>
> 10G ethernet exists, but isn't common, and will be much more
> difficult to do in an FPGA. In that case, you get 125 bytes,
> enough for the ethernet, IP, UDP header and a small amount
> of data.

Message rate is relatively low. Response time is the important measure. 
Latency will be measured externally with a network protocol analyzer. Run 
side by side with a software solution, its packets must appear first in the 
sniffer trace. The competition is an overclocked multi-core Intel, running 
Linux with RT extensions and optimized stacks.

>
>> Yes, I see the problem with implementing the TCP stack in HDL.
>> Are there commercial IP that do this in FPGA logic?
>> I know it can be done in soft- or onboard processors.
>> I think this can be set aside for the moment as an
>> integration exercise. Say the bytes magically appaer in
>> block ram, and then...
>
> You wand UDP. Note that TCP includes acknowledge and
> retransmit after a time expires. That, in addition to it
> being a stream protocol, make is all wrong for this problem.

Agreed. The network stack will go on an onboard processor. It needs ARP, 
IGMP, and the whole mess anyway.

>
>> Getting back to reasonable expectations of competency.
>> Can I expect a EE, having studied diligently and earned his
>> bachelors, to already know how to efficiently find a fixed
>> byte pattern in the first N bytes in a message?
>
> Hmm, I suppose a good chance on that one.
>
>> Can he implement a hash table in FPGA logic? Can he take
>> a file containing sample data and create simulation scripts
>> and validate his designs?
>
> Just for lookups, or does it have to add new entries
> to the table from the input?

No new entries from the realtime stream, but added to or modified 
periodically elsewise. What are the problems?



Article: 153598
Subject: Re: Expectations from newly minted EE?
From: "MikeWhy" <boat042-nospam@yahoo.com>
Date: Tue, 3 Apr 2012 12:22:02 -0500
Links: << >>  << T >>  << A >>
Tim Wescott wrote:
> Universities don't teach kids how to _do_ -- they build a foundation,
> on which one builds a house by one's own efforts.  So the amount of
> practical ability that a kid will have coming out of college will vary

<snip>

> Having said that, getting an EE who's already been in the working
> world and done some circuit design of some sort will winnow out all
> the candidates that got through school then found out that they
> really wanted to be in Marketing, or lack necessary working-world
> skills, etc.

Unsurprisingly not very different from software. I have been rather 
impressed lately with recent CS grads. They seemed head and shoulders above 
what we were seeing ten years ago. But that might have more to do with the 
hiring process before they reached me. I actually felt that maybe academia 
had finally caught up to industry. I wondered if the same might be true of 
EE.


Article: 153599
Subject: Re: Expectations from newly minted EE?
From: glen herrmannsfeldt <gah@ugcs.caltech.edu>
Date: Tue, 3 Apr 2012 18:35:20 +0000 (UTC)
Links: << >>  << T >>  << A >>
MikeWhy <boat042-nospam@yahoo.com> wrote:

(snip)
>>> It doesn't need to "win" by a big margin, but it needs to win
>>> 100% of the time. Is 100 ns big or small in your world?

100% of the packets? There is some statistical nature to
this, such as an ARP request might come through once in a while,
and maybe not at the same time as the competition system.
Not very often, so maybe only 99.9%.

Also, any broadcast traffic on the net will be received by
all hosts, which must then ignore it if not needed.

>> How are you measuring latency? For gigabit ethernet, 100ns
>> is 100 bits, or about 12 bytes. I would normally measure from
>> the beginning of the request coming in to the end of the reply.

>> 10G ethernet exists, but isn't common, and will be much more
>> difficult to do in an FPGA. In that case, you get 125 bytes,
>> enough for the ethernet, IP, UDP header and a small amount
>> of data.

> Message rate is relatively low. Response time is the important measure. 
> Latency will be measured externally with a network protocol analyzer. 
> Run side by side with a software solution, its packets must appear 
> first in the sniffer trace. The competition is an overclocked 
> multi-core Intel, running Linux with RT extensions and optimized 
> stacks.

In the more usual FPGA based hardware accelerator, the total time
is what is measured. Not that it shouldn't win per packet.

So, I will guess that UDP packets are sent multicast such
that each system sees it at the same time. (There is no multicast
for TCP.) 


(snip, I wrote)
>> You wand UDP. Note that TCP includes acknowledge and
>> retransmit after a time expires. That, in addition to it
>> being a stream protocol, make is all wrong for this problem.

> Agreed. The network stack will go on an onboard processor. 
> It needs ARP, IGMP, and the whole mess anyway.

I soft (or hard) processor should take care of all that, with
only the specific request packets handled by a (relatively) simple 
state machine. 

>>> Getting back to reasonable expectations of competency.
>>> Can I expect a EE, having studied diligently and earned his
>>> bachelors, to already know how to efficiently find a fixed
>>> byte pattern in the first N bytes in a message?

>> Hmm, I suppose a good chance on that one.

Problems like that are common homework problems in some
EE/CS classes. 

>>> Can he implement a hash table in FPGA logic? Can he take
>>> a file containing sample data and create simulation scripts
>>> and validate his designs?

>> Just for lookups, or does it have to add new entries
>> to the table from the input?

> No new entries from the realtime stream, but added to or 
> modified periodically elsewise. What are the problems?

No problem if it is just for lookups. 

I will guess that you should be able to run a 100MHz clock,
but maybe a little slower with more done on each cycle.

The state machine has to recognize incoming data, send other
data to the processor, extract the appropriate fields from
requests, process and generate the data to return, and clock
out the return packet. 

You might have a BSEE do the state machine and BSCS do the
code to run the rest of the IP stack (ARP and routing) and
updating the hash table.

-- glen




Site Home   Archive Home   FAQ Home   How to search the Archive   How to Navigate the Archive   
Compare FPGA features and resources   

Threads starting:
1994JulAugSepOctNovDec1994
1995JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec1995
1996JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec1996
1997JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec1997
1998JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec1998
1999JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec1999
2000JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec2000
2001JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec2001
2002JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec2002
2003JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec2003
2004JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec2004
2005JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec2005
2006JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec2006
2007JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec2007
2008JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec2008
2009JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec2009
2010JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec2010
2011JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec2011
2012JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec2012
2013JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec2013
2014JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec2014
2015JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec2015
2016JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec2016
2017JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec2017
2018JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec2018
2019JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec2019
2020JanFebMarAprMay2020

Authors:A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z

Custom Search