Site Home   Archive Home   FAQ Home   How to search the Archive   How to Navigate the Archive   
Compare FPGA features and resources   

Threads starting:
1994JulAugSepOctNovDec1994
1995JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec1995
1996JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec1996
1997JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec1997
1998JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec1998
1999JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec1999
2000JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec2000
2001JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec2001
2002JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec2002
2003JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec2003
2004JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec2004
2005JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec2005
2006JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec2006
2007JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec2007
2008JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec2008
2009JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec2009
2010JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec2010
2011JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec2011
2012JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec2012
2013JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec2013
2014JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec2014
2015JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec2015
2016JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec2016
2017JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec2017
2018JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec2018
2019JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec2019
2020JanFebMarAprMay2020

Authors:A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z

Custom Search

Messages from 157050

Article: 157050
Subject: Comparision of Advantages/Disadvantges of Verilog or VHDL in Hardware verification
From: jayadeep90kodali@gmail.com
Date: Tue, 16 Sep 2014 17:07:18 -0700 (PDT)
Links: << >>  << T >>  << A >>
Hi Guys, 

I was asked to prepare a presentation on the topic below for a job interview: 

Comparision of Advantages/Disadvantges of Verilog or VHDL in Hardware verification 

Someone plz educate me. I am new to these. 

Thank you. 

Regards, 
Jay 

Article: 157051
Subject: Re: Comparision of Advantages/Disadvantges of Verilog or VHDL in
From: Tom Gardner <spamjunk@blueyonder.co.uk>
Date: Wed, 17 Sep 2014 08:24:06 +0100
Links: << >>  << T >>  << A >>
On 17/09/14 01:07, jayadeep90kodali@gmail.com wrote:
> Hi Guys,
>
> I was asked to prepare a presentation on the topic below for a job interview:
>
> Comparision of Advantages/Disadvantges of Verilog or VHDL in Hardware verification
>
> Someone plz educate me. I am new to these.

Thank you for your honesty - it does you credit.

If they expect you to provide answers reflecting your experience
on a topic of which you do not have any experience, then they are
jerks and you don't want to work for them. If you got the job
either you would struggle or they are bullshitters that will
eventually cause lot of problems for you or their clients

If they expect you to provide answers on a topic of which they
know you don't have any experience, then this is a test to see
how you can assimilate new information. If we spoon fed you answers
and you got the job, you would end up struggling.

However, you might like to look at http://bit.ly/1u62F8A



Article: 157052
Subject: Re: Comparision of Advantages/Disadvantges of Verilog or VHDL in Hardware verification
From: glen herrmannsfeldt <gah@ugcs.caltech.edu>
Date: Wed, 17 Sep 2014 09:55:03 +0000 (UTC)
Links: << >>  << T >>  << A >>
jayadeep90kodali@gmail.com wrote:
 
> I was asked to prepare a presentation on the topic below for 
> a job interview: 
 
> Comparision of Advantages/Disadvantges of Verilog or VHDL in 
> Hardware verification 

Do you mean compare Verilog vs. VHDL, or HDLs vs. something else?

If you have done hardware logic design, then we can probably
explain some of what you need to know.  If not, then you have
a lot to learn.

-- glen



Article: 157053
Subject: Re: Comparision of Advantages/Disadvantges of Verilog or VHDL in Hardware verification
From: "jt_eaton" <84408@embeddedrelated>
Date: Wed, 17 Sep 2014 13:43:43 -0500
Links: << >>  << T >>  << A >>
>Hi Guys, 
>
>I was asked to prepare a presentation on the topic below for a job
interview: 
>
>Comparision of Advantages/Disadvantges of Verilog or VHDL in Hardware
verification 
>
>Someone plz educate me. I am new to these. 
>
>Thank you. 
>
>Regards, 
>Jay 
>

I suspect that the job involves a lot of teaching  and customer
presentations. They are really judging you on your communication skills.
The verilog/vhdl is not important.

John Eaton	   
					
---------------------------------------		
Posted through http://www.FPGARelated.com

Article: 157054
Subject: NetCPU or DotNetCPU DB200 anyone?
From: glen herrmannsfeldt <gah@ugcs.caltech.edu>
Date: Wed, 17 Sep 2014 22:21:47 +0000 (UTC)
Links: << >>  << T >>  << A >>
I have a DB200 that seems to be from NetCPU, or dotnetcpu.com,
though the domain seems not to exist.

Pretty much nothing comes out in a google search.

It would be nice to know the processor (it is missing from the
board, but I believe everything else is there).

A little documentation would be nice, too. 

The board has USB, serial, A/D, D/A ports, an LCD display, and
a big breadboard area to add your own circuits. Power from USB,
external supply, or 9V battery.

Would be fun to try out, but I need a little more information.

-- glen

Article: 157055
Subject: Re: NetCPU or DotNetCPU DB200 anyone?
From: rickman <gnuarm@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 17 Sep 2014 18:55:04 -0400
Links: << >>  << T >>  << A >>
On 9/17/2014 6:21 PM, glen herrmannsfeldt wrote:
> I have a DB200 that seems to be from NetCPU, or dotnetcpu.com,
> though the domain seems not to exist.
>
> Pretty much nothing comes out in a google search.
>
> It would be nice to know the processor (it is missing from the
> board, but I believe everything else is there).
>
> A little documentation would be nice, too.
>
> The board has USB, serial, A/D, D/A ports, an LCD display, and
> a big breadboard area to add your own circuits. Power from USB,
> external supply, or 9V battery.
>
> Would be fun to try out, but I need a little more information.

I did some searching and found this link...

http://tech.slashdot.org/story/04/12/14/0316213/a-net-cpu

which has a link to a "website"

http://www.dotnetcpu.com/

Which takes me to...

http://devicesolutions.net/

You might try asking them about it.  They seem to be making CPU modules 
and motherboards so maybe there is some compatibility still... ?  But 
this is a 10 year old product.  You could probably have more fun (and 
less frustration) with a rPi or something.

-- 

Rick

Article: 157056
Subject: Re: NetCPU or DotNetCPU DB200 anyone?
From: glen herrmannsfeldt <gah@ugcs.caltech.edu>
Date: Wed, 17 Sep 2014 23:00:40 +0000 (UTC)
Links: << >>  << T >>  << A >>
rickman <gnuarm@gmail.com> wrote:

(snip, I wrote)

>> I have a DB200 that seems to be from NetCPU, or dotnetcpu.com,
>> though the domain seems not to exist.

>> Pretty much nothing comes out in a google search.

>> It would be nice to know the processor (it is missing from the
>> board, but I believe everything else is there).

>> A little documentation would be nice, too.

(snip)

> I did some searching and found this link...
 
> http://tech.slashdot.org/story/04/12/14/0316213/a-net-cpu

I think I found that, too, but it didn't seem to have anything
related to a DB200. 
 
> which has a link to a "website"
 
> http://www.dotnetcpu.com/
 
> Which takes me to...
 
> http://devicesolutions.net/
 
> You might try asking them about it.  They seem to be making CPU modules 
> and motherboards so maybe there is some compatibility still... ?  But 
> this is a 10 year old product.  You could probably have more fun (and 
> less frustration) with a rPi or something.

Thanks.  Yes, I haven't tried one of those yet.

From some other search, there is a hint that it might be an ARM7
CPU (as I said, the CPU isn't there).  Anyone know if they come
in a 32 pin DIP?  (Seems a rare package size to me.)

-- glen



Article: 157057
Subject: Re: NetCPU or DotNetCPU DB200 anyone?
From: rickman <gnuarm@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 17 Sep 2014 19:19:51 -0400
Links: << >>  << T >>  << A >>
On 9/17/2014 7:00 PM, glen herrmannsfeldt wrote:
> rickman <gnuarm@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> (snip, I wrote)
>
>>> I have a DB200 that seems to be from NetCPU, or dotnetcpu.com,
>>> though the domain seems not to exist.
>
>>> Pretty much nothing comes out in a google search.
>
>>> It would be nice to know the processor (it is missing from the
>>> board, but I believe everything else is there).
>
>>> A little documentation would be nice, too.
>
> (snip)
>
>> I did some searching and found this link...
>
>> http://tech.slashdot.org/story/04/12/14/0316213/a-net-cpu
>
> I think I found that, too, but it didn't seem to have anything
> related to a DB200.
>
>> which has a link to a "website"
>
>> http://www.dotnetcpu.com/
>
>> Which takes me to...
>
>> http://devicesolutions.net/
>
>> You might try asking them about it.  They seem to be making CPU modules
>> and motherboards so maybe there is some compatibility still... ?  But
>> this is a 10 year old product.  You could probably have more fun (and
>> less frustration) with a rPi or something.
>
> Thanks.  Yes, I haven't tried one of those yet.
>
>  From some other search, there is a hint that it might be an ARM7
> CPU (as I said, the CPU isn't there).  Anyone know if they come
> in a 32 pin DIP?  (Seems a rare package size to me.)

Hmmm... 32 pin DIP?  I don't recall ever seeing a 32 pin DIP at all. 
ARM7 sounds right for the time frame.  Makers from that time would 
include Atmel, NXP and a German company I can't recall.  I don't think 
Atmel produced DIPs, maybe NXP.  I believe the German company produced 
DIPs.  I'll see if I can find the name.  They were making automotive units.

-- 

Rick

Article: 157058
Subject: Re: NetCPU or DotNetCPU DB200 anyone?
From: Anders.Montonen@kapsi.spam.stop.fi.invalid
Date: Thu, 18 Sep 2014 10:58:54 +0000 (UTC)
Links: << >>  << T >>  << A >>
rickman <gnuarm@gmail.com> wrote:
> On 9/17/2014 7:00 PM, glen herrmannsfeldt wrote:
>>
>>  From some other search, there is a hint that it might be an ARM7
>> CPU (as I said, the CPU isn't there).  Anyone know if they come
>> in a 32 pin DIP?  (Seems a rare package size to me.)
> Hmmm... 32 pin DIP?  I don't recall ever seeing a 32 pin DIP at all. 
> ARM7 sounds right for the time frame.  Makers from that time would 
> include Atmel, NXP and a German company I can't recall.  I don't think 
> Atmel produced DIPs, maybe NXP.  I believe the German company produced 
> DIPs.  I'll see if I can find the name.  They were making automotive units.

Going by one comment in the Slashdot thread, it would have been a BGA 
chip mounted on a carrier board: 
<http://tech.slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=132691&cid=11080091>

-a

Article: 157059
Subject: Re: NetCPU or DotNetCPU DB200 anyone?
From: "mnentwig" <24789@embeddedrelated>
Date: Thu, 18 Sep 2014 13:50:02 -0500
Links: << >>  << T >>  << A >>
>> and a German company I can't recall
Temic semiconductors, maybe?
	   
					
---------------------------------------		
Posted through http://www.FPGARelated.com

Article: 157060
Subject: Re: NetCPU or DotNetCPU DB200 anyone?
From: rickman <gnuarm@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 18 Sep 2014 17:59:48 -0400
Links: << >>  << T >>  << A >>
On 9/18/2014 2:50 PM, mnentwig wrote:
>>> and a German company I can't recall
> Temic semiconductors, maybe?

No, that doesn't ring any bells, but maybe this bell is old and makes 
very little noise anymore.  I want to say they had a narrow product line 
mostly around automotive.  They used bigger packages and 5 volt 
supplies.  They may have been absorbed by now.

-- 

Rick

Article: 157061
Subject: Re: NetCPU or DotNetCPU DB200 anyone?
From: rickman <gnuarm@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 18 Sep 2014 18:00:37 -0400
Links: << >>  << T >>  << A >>
On 9/18/2014 6:58 AM, Anders.Montonen@kapsi.spam.stop.fi.invalid wrote:
> rickman <gnuarm@gmail.com> wrote:
>> On 9/17/2014 7:00 PM, glen herrmannsfeldt wrote:
>>>
>>>   From some other search, there is a hint that it might be an ARM7
>>> CPU (as I said, the CPU isn't there).  Anyone know if they come
>>> in a 32 pin DIP?  (Seems a rare package size to me.)
>> Hmmm... 32 pin DIP?  I don't recall ever seeing a 32 pin DIP at all.
>> ARM7 sounds right for the time frame.  Makers from that time would
>> include Atmel, NXP and a German company I can't recall.  I don't think
>> Atmel produced DIPs, maybe NXP.  I believe the German company produced
>> DIPs.  I'll see if I can find the name.  They were making automotive units.
>
> Going by one comment in the Slashdot thread, it would have been a BGA
> chip mounted on a carrier board:
> <http://tech.slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=132691&cid=11080091>

Anyone notice the "~450,000 instructions per second"?  That is pretty 
slow even by Z80 standards.  Must be a mistake.

-- 

Rick

Article: 157062
Subject: Re: NetCPU or DotNetCPU DB200 anyone?
From: glen herrmannsfeldt <gah@ugcs.caltech.edu>
Date: Fri, 19 Sep 2014 02:46:54 +0000 (UTC)
Links: << >>  << T >>  << A >>
rickman <gnuarm@gmail.com> wrote:

(snip, someone wrote)
>> Going by one comment in the Slashdot thread, it would have been a BGA
>> chip mounted on a carrier board:
>> <http://tech.slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=132691&cid=11080091>
 
> Anyone notice the "~450,000 instructions per second"?  That is pretty 
> slow even by Z80 standards.  Must be a mistake.

There is something about a processor directly executing C# code,
or compiled C# code. 

It might be the 450,000 instructions/second isn't bad if they
are complicated enough instructions.

-- glen

Article: 157063
Subject: Re: NetCPU or DotNetCPU DB200 anyone?
From: Anders.Montonen@kapsi.spam.stop.fi.invalid
Date: Fri, 19 Sep 2014 08:00:43 +0000 (UTC)
Links: << >>  << T >>  << A >>
rickman <gnuarm@gmail.com> wrote:
> Anyone notice the "~450,000 instructions per second"?  That is pretty 
> slow even by Z80 standards.  Must be a mistake.

The speculation in the same thread was that this meant CIL bytecode 
instructions.

-a

Article: 157064
Subject: Re: NetCPU or DotNetCPU DB200 anyone?
From: Jon Elson <jmelson@wustl.edu>
Date: Fri, 19 Sep 2014 13:53:57 -0500
Links: << >>  << T >>  << A >>
rickman wrote:

 You could probably have more fun (and
> less frustration) with a rPi or something.
> 
The ultimate hacking paradise, in my opinion, is the
Beagle Bone!  LOTS of gpio pins, the only thing that is doesn't
currently support well is 3D graphics acceleration.  I've
used the earlier Beagle Boards in some one-off projects, and
now the Bone in a couple, and they are really great.  The new
Bone board has two 200 MHz (200 MIPS) 32-bit microcontrollers
in it, that can do fast I/O.  I used this in my latest project to
replace a very old PC using a DMA board.

Jon

Article: 157065
Subject: Re: NetCPU or DotNetCPU DB200 anyone?
From: rickman <gnuarm@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 19 Sep 2014 21:42:21 -0400
Links: << >>  << T >>  << A >>
On 9/19/2014 2:53 PM, Jon Elson wrote:
> rickman wrote:
>
>   You could probably have more fun (and
>> less frustration) with a rPi or something.
>>
> The ultimate hacking paradise, in my opinion, is the
> Beagle Bone!  LOTS of gpio pins, the only thing that is doesn't
> currently support well is 3D graphics acceleration.  I've
> used the earlier Beagle Boards in some one-off projects, and
> now the Bone in a couple, and they are really great.  The new
> Bone board has two 200 MHz (200 MIPS) 32-bit microcontrollers
> in it, that can do fast I/O.  I used this in my latest project to
> replace a very old PC using a DMA board.

I have been wanting to get into the BBB, but I know *nothing* about 
Linux and I don't see nearly as much "getting started" info for the true 
newwbies.  I'd really like to roll an I/O card and see if I can get it 
to take off, but I would need support for the software.

I'm not sure the rPi is much better for *real* support I guess.  I've 
been nosing around the rPi forum and other than pissing off a few of the 
regulars I have not gotten much info.  Someone pointed me to a project 
written up in Magpi about interfacing a fast ADC, but the guy sets up a 
10 MHz clock for the ADC sample line and then goes into a tight loop 
reading the data with *no* synchronization..  what???

I used to belong to the BB support Google Group until I quit using 
Google groups.  Even the group owner hated GG because they keep changing 
stuff and breaking it for him.  But he won't find another way to do his 
support.

-- 

Rick

Article: 157066
Subject: Re: NetCPU or DotNetCPU DB200 anyone?
From: langwadt@fonz.dk
Date: Sat, 20 Sep 2014 15:47:50 -0700 (PDT)
Links: << >>  << T >>  << A >>
Den l=F8rdag den 20. september 2014 03.42.21 UTC+2 skrev rickman:
> On 9/19/2014 2:53 PM, Jon Elson wrote:
>=20
> > rickman wrote:
>=20
> >
>=20
> >   You could probably have more fun (and
>=20
> >> less frustration) with a rPi or something.
>=20
> >>
>=20
> > The ultimate hacking paradise, in my opinion, is the
>=20
> > Beagle Bone!  LOTS of gpio pins, the only thing that is doesn't
>=20
> > currently support well is 3D graphics acceleration.  I've
>=20
> > used the earlier Beagle Boards in some one-off projects, and
>=20
> > now the Bone in a couple, and they are really great.  The new
>=20
> > Bone board has two 200 MHz (200 MIPS) 32-bit microcontrollers
>=20
> > in it, that can do fast I/O.  I used this in my latest project to
>=20
> > replace a very old PC using a DMA board.
>=20
>=20
>=20
> I have been wanting to get into the BBB, but I know *nothing* about=20
>=20
> Linux and I don't see nearly as much "getting started" info for the true=
=20
>=20
> newwbies.  I'd really like to roll an I/O card and see if I can get it=20
>=20
> to take off, but I would need support for the software.
>=20
>=20

nothing about linux as in never used it or as in never looked at the=20
technical details?

You might want to look at what there is around for working with Xilinx Zynq
on MicroZed for example

I knew nothing about linux except having used unix at uni many years ago, b=
ut it wasn't *that* hard with the help of google to figure out how to build=
 linux kernels, tweak drivers, and talking to the hardware =20


-Lasse



Article: 157067
Subject: Re: NetCPU or DotNetCPU DB200 anyone?
From: rickman <gnuarm@gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 20 Sep 2014 19:24:45 -0400
Links: << >>  << T >>  << A >>
On 9/20/2014 6:47 PM, langwadt@fonz.dk wrote:
> Den lørdag den 20. september 2014 03.42.21 UTC+2 skrev rickman:
>> On 9/19/2014 2:53 PM, Jon Elson wrote:
>>
>>> rickman wrote:
>>
>>>
>>
>>>    You could probably have more fun (and
>>
>>>> less frustration) with a rPi or something.
>>
>>>>
>>
>>> The ultimate hacking paradise, in my opinion, is the
>>
>>> Beagle Bone!  LOTS of gpio pins, the only thing that is doesn't
>>
>>> currently support well is 3D graphics acceleration.  I've
>>
>>> used the earlier Beagle Boards in some one-off projects, and
>>
>>> now the Bone in a couple, and they are really great.  The new
>>
>>> Bone board has two 200 MHz (200 MIPS) 32-bit microcontrollers
>>
>>> in it, that can do fast I/O.  I used this in my latest project to
>>
>>> replace a very old PC using a DMA board.
>>
>>
>>
>> I have been wanting to get into the BBB, but I know *nothing* about
>>
>> Linux and I don't see nearly as much "getting started" info for the true
>>
>> newwbies.  I'd really like to roll an I/O card and see if I can get it
>>
>> to take off, but I would need support for the software.
>>
>>
>
> nothing about linux as in never used it or as in never looked at the
> technical details?
>
> You might want to look at what there is around for working with Xilinx Zynq
> on MicroZed for example

I have zero interest in working with the Zynq.  My understanding is they 
lock you to their tools for many aspects of the design, a rather 
autopilot thing.  It's also everything about FPGAs that I have little 
interest in, physically large, power hungry, expensive...


> I knew nothing about linux except having used unix at uni many years ago, but it wasn't *that* hard with the help of google to figure out how to build linux kernels, tweak drivers, and talking to the hardware

When it comes to compiling Linux stuff my experience has been that there 
are so many details that aren't given that it is a chore figuring out. 
Maybe I'm just old and cranky anymore.  I like working next to the metal 
where I can read the manual about the registers and figure it out.  It 
just seems like the software side these days has gotten much more 
complex than it needs to be.

-- 

Rick

Article: 157068
Subject: opencores.org
From: "jt_eaton" <84408@embeddedrelated>
Date: Sun, 21 Sep 2014 18:39:55 -0500
Links: << >>  << T >>  << A >>


I haven't been able to reach this site for the last couple of days. Anyone
know what's going on?


John Eaton

	   
					
---------------------------------------		
Posted through http://www.FPGARelated.com

Article: 157069
Subject: Re: opencores.org
From: Nikolaos Kavvadias <nikolaos.kavvadias@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 22 Sep 2014 01:53:20 -0700 (PDT)
Links: << >>  << T >>  << A >>
Hi John,

> I haven't been able to reach this site for the last couple of days. Anyone
> know what's going on?
> John Eaton

We have been discussing the issue on this comp.lang.vhdl thread:
https://groups.google.com/forum/#!topic/comp.lang.vhdl/im57fb5ALgM

It seems opencores.org is back up.

Best regards
Nikolaos Kavvadias
http://www.nkavvadias.com

Article: 157070
Subject: Re: opencores.org
From: WangoTango <Asgard24@mindspring.com>
Date: Mon, 22 Sep 2014 15:11:28 -0400
Links: << >>  << T >>  << A >>
In article <rtGdnWfaSb9W_ILJnZ2dnUU7-SOdnZ2d@giganews.com>, 84408
@embeddedrelated says...
> 
> 
> I haven't been able to reach this site for the last couple of days. Anyone
> know what's going on?
> 
> 
> John Eaton
> 
> 	   
I noticed it Friday night and did a little digging.
It looks like opencores.org didn't renew their domain name and now there 
is a squatter holding it.
I just did a quick whois and now it looks to be available????
Hell, I'm not sure.



Article: 157071
Subject: Re: NetCPU or DotNetCPU DB200 anyone?
From: langwadt@fonz.dk
Date: Mon, 22 Sep 2014 12:52:13 -0700 (PDT)
Links: << >>  << T >>  << A >>
Den s=C3=B8ndag den 21. september 2014 01.24.45 UTC+2 skrev rickman:
> On 9/20/2014 6:47 PM, langwadt@fonz.dk wrote:
>=20
> > Den l=EF=BF=BDrdag den 20. september 2014 03.42.21 UTC+2 skrev rickman:
>=20
> >> On 9/19/2014 2:53 PM, Jon Elson wrote:
>=20
> >>
>=20
> >>> rickman wrote:
>=20
> >>
>=20
> >>>
>=20
> >>
>=20
> >>>    You could probably have more fun (and
>=20
> >>
>=20
> >>>> less frustration) with a rPi or something.
>=20
> >>
>=20
> >>>>
>=20
> >>
>=20
> >>> The ultimate hacking paradise, in my opinion, is the
>=20
> >>
>=20
> >>> Beagle Bone!  LOTS of gpio pins, the only thing that is doesn't
>=20
> >>
>=20
> >>> currently support well is 3D graphics acceleration.  I've
>=20
> >>
>=20
> >>> used the earlier Beagle Boards in some one-off projects, and
>=20
> >>
>=20
> >>> now the Bone in a couple, and they are really great.  The new
>=20
> >>
>=20
> >>> Bone board has two 200 MHz (200 MIPS) 32-bit microcontrollers
>=20
> >>
>=20
> >>> in it, that can do fast I/O.  I used this in my latest project to
>=20
> >>
>=20
> >>> replace a very old PC using a DMA board.
>=20
> >>
>=20
> >>
>=20
> >>
>=20
> >> I have been wanting to get into the BBB, but I know *nothing* about
>=20
> >>
>=20
> >> Linux and I don't see nearly as much "getting started" info for the tr=
ue
>=20
> >>
>=20
> >> newwbies.  I'd really like to roll an I/O card and see if I can get it
>=20
> >>
>=20
> >> to take off, but I would need support for the software.
>=20
> >>
>=20
> >>
>=20
> >
>=20
> > nothing about linux as in never used it or as in never looked at the
>=20
> > technical details?
>=20
> >
>=20
> > You might want to look at what there is around for working with Xilinx =
Zynq
>=20
> > on MicroZed for example
>=20
>=20
>=20
> I have zero interest in working with the Zynq.  My understanding is they=
=20
>=20
> lock you to their tools for many aspects of the design, a rather=20
>=20
> autopilot thing.  It's also everything about FPGAs that I have little=20
>=20
> interest in, physically large, power hungry, expensive...
>=20
>=20

You wouldn't have to use Zynq my point was that there seems to be many reas=
onably straight forward description on how to get linux up and running
i.e. download these repositories from github, set the variables to do cross=
 compiling, here's how to compile the kernel, a driver, uboot, make a devic=
etree
and where to put the resulting files on an SD card to get the thing running

The tools to use the Programmable logic is obviously Xilinx only, all FPGAs=
 are

But everything else seems to be open source stuff and gcc

The Zynq on a microzed is a 400pin bga, about the same as most other dual c=
ore ARMs, the one I have running her eon the table uses ~1W running linux

>=20
>=20
>=20
> > I knew nothing about linux except having used unix at uni many years ag=
o, but it wasn't *that* hard with the help of google to figure out how to b=
uild linux kernels, tweak drivers, and talking to the hardware
>=20
>=20
>=20
> When it comes to compiling Linux stuff my experience has been that there=
=20
>=20
> are so many details that aren't given that it is a chore figuring out.=20
>=20
> Maybe I'm just old and cranky anymore.  I like working next to the metal=
=20
>=20
> where I can read the manual about the registers and figure it out.  It=20
>=20
> just seems like the software side these days has gotten much more=20
>=20
> complex than it needs to be.
>=20

I hear you, but those big chips with heaps of peripherals are complex so wh=
ile it seems like it I'm not sure the software is really more complex than =
needed.=20
=20

-Lasse

Article: 157072
Subject: Re: NetCPU or DotNetCPU DB200 anyone?
From: rickman <gnuarm@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 22 Sep 2014 16:13:36 -0400
Links: << >>  << T >>  << A >>
On 9/22/2014 3:52 PM, langwadt@fonz.dk wrote:
> Den søndag den 21. september 2014 01.24.45 UTC+2 skrev rickman:
>> On 9/20/2014 6:47 PM, langwadt@fonz.dk wrote:
>>
>>> Den l�rdag den 20. september 2014 03.42.21 UTC+2 skrev rickman:
>>
>>>> On 9/19/2014 2:53 PM, Jon Elson wrote:
>>
>>>>
>>
>>>>> rickman wrote:
>>
>>>>
>>
>>>>>
>>
>>>>
>>
>>>>>     You could probably have more fun (and
>>
>>>>
>>
>>>>>> less frustration) with a rPi or something.
>>
>>>>
>>
>>>>>>
>>
>>>>
>>
>>>>> The ultimate hacking paradise, in my opinion, is the
>>
>>>>
>>
>>>>> Beagle Bone!  LOTS of gpio pins, the only thing that is doesn't
>>
>>>>
>>
>>>>> currently support well is 3D graphics acceleration.  I've
>>
>>>>
>>
>>>>> used the earlier Beagle Boards in some one-off projects, and
>>
>>>>
>>
>>>>> now the Bone in a couple, and they are really great.  The new
>>
>>>>
>>
>>>>> Bone board has two 200 MHz (200 MIPS) 32-bit microcontrollers
>>
>>>>
>>
>>>>> in it, that can do fast I/O.  I used this in my latest project to
>>
>>>>
>>
>>>>> replace a very old PC using a DMA board.
>>
>>>>
>>
>>>>
>>
>>>>
>>
>>>> I have been wanting to get into the BBB, but I know *nothing* about
>>
>>>>
>>
>>>> Linux and I don't see nearly as much "getting started" info for the true
>>
>>>>
>>
>>>> newwbies.  I'd really like to roll an I/O card and see if I can get it
>>
>>>>
>>
>>>> to take off, but I would need support for the software.
>>
>>>>
>>
>>>>
>>
>>>
>>
>>> nothing about linux as in never used it or as in never looked at the
>>
>>> technical details?
>>
>>>
>>
>>> You might want to look at what there is around for working with Xilinx Zynq
>>
>>> on MicroZed for example
>>
>>
>>
>> I have zero interest in working with the Zynq.  My understanding is they
>>
>> lock you to their tools for many aspects of the design, a rather
>>
>> autopilot thing.  It's also everything about FPGAs that I have little
>>
>> interest in, physically large, power hungry, expensive...
>>
>>
>
> You wouldn't have to use Zynq my point was that there seems to be many reasonably straight forward description on how to get linux up and running
> i.e. download these repositories from github, set the variables to do cross compiling, here's how to compile the kernel, a driver, uboot, make a devicetree
> and where to put the resulting files on an SD card to get the thing running

Uh, why do you list all that as if it is all trivial?


> The tools to use the Programmable logic is obviously Xilinx only, all FPGAs are
>
> But everything else seems to be open source stuff and gcc

I haven't looked myself, but I was told that they require you to use 
Xilinx tools to load the code.  Maybe that is to load the code from the 
bitstream.


> The Zynq on a microzed is a 400pin bga, about the same as most other dual core ARMs, the one I have running her eon the table uses ~1W running linux

Yes, that is large and power hungry.  I don't typically do project that 
use such large devices.


>>> I knew nothing about linux except having used unix at uni many years ago, but it wasn't *that* hard with the help of google to figure out how to build linux kernels, tweak drivers, and talking to the hardware
>>
>>
>>
>> When it comes to compiling Linux stuff my experience has been that there
>>
>> are so many details that aren't given that it is a chore figuring out.
>>
>> Maybe I'm just old and cranky anymore.  I like working next to the metal
>>
>> where I can read the manual about the registers and figure it out.  It
>>
>> just seems like the software side these days has gotten much more
>>
>> complex than it needs to be.
>>
>
> I hear you, but those big chips with heaps of peripherals are complex so while it seems like it I'm not sure the software is really more complex than needed.
>
>
> -Lasse
>


-- 

Rick

Article: 157073
Subject: Re: NetCPU or DotNetCPU DB200 anyone?
From: langwadt@fonz.dk
Date: Mon, 22 Sep 2014 14:46:19 -0700 (PDT)
Links: << >>  << T >>  << A >>
Den mandag den 22. september 2014 22.13.36 UTC+2 skrev rickman:
> On 9/22/2014 3:52 PM, langwadt@fonz.dk wrote:
>=20
> > Den s=C3=B8ndag den 21. september 2014 01.24.45 UTC+2 skrev rickman:
>=20
> >> On 9/20/2014 6:47 PM, langwadt@fonz.dk wrote:
>=20
> >>
>=20
> >>> Den l=EF=BF=BDrdag den 20. september 2014 03.42.21 UTC+2 skrev rickma=
n:
>=20
> >>
>=20
> >>>> On 9/19/2014 2:53 PM, Jon Elson wrote:
>=20
> >>
>=20
> >>>>
>=20
> >>
>=20
> >>>>> rickman wrote:
>=20
> >>
>=20
> >>>>
>=20
> >>
>=20
> >>>>>
>=20
> >>
>=20
> >>>>
>=20
> >>
>=20
> >>>>>     You could probably have more fun (and
>=20
> >>
>=20
> >>>>
>=20
> >>
>=20
> >>>>>> less frustration) with a rPi or something.
>=20
> >>
>=20
> >>>>
>=20
> >>
>=20
> >>>>>>
>=20
> >>
>=20
> >>>>
>=20
> >>
>=20
> >>>>> The ultimate hacking paradise, in my opinion, is the
>=20
> >>
>=20
> >>>>
>=20
> >>
>=20
> >>>>> Beagle Bone!  LOTS of gpio pins, the only thing that is doesn't
>=20
> >>
>=20
> >>>>
>=20
> >>
>=20
> >>>>> currently support well is 3D graphics acceleration.  I've
>=20
> >>
>=20
> >>>>
>=20
> >>
>=20
> >>>>> used the earlier Beagle Boards in some one-off projects, and
>=20
> >>
>=20
> >>>>
>=20
> >>
>=20
> >>>>> now the Bone in a couple, and they are really great.  The new
>=20
> >>
>=20
> >>>>
>=20
> >>
>=20
> >>>>> Bone board has two 200 MHz (200 MIPS) 32-bit microcontrollers
>=20
> >>
>=20
> >>>>
>=20
> >>
>=20
> >>>>> in it, that can do fast I/O.  I used this in my latest project to
>=20
> >>
>=20
> >>>>
>=20
> >>
>=20
> >>>>> replace a very old PC using a DMA board.
>=20
> >>
>=20
> >>>>
>=20
> >>
>=20
> >>>>
>=20
> >>
>=20
> >>>>
>=20
> >>
>=20
> >>>> I have been wanting to get into the BBB, but I know *nothing* about
>=20
> >>
>=20
> >>>>
>=20
> >>
>=20
> >>>> Linux and I don't see nearly as much "getting started" info for the =
true
>=20
> >>
>=20
> >>>>
>=20
> >>
>=20
> >>>> newwbies.  I'd really like to roll an I/O card and see if I can get =
it
>=20
> >>
>=20
> >>>>
>=20
> >>
>=20
> >>>> to take off, but I would need support for the software.
>=20
> >>
>=20
> >>>>
>=20
> >>
>=20
> >>>>
>=20
> >>
>=20
> >>>
>=20
> >>
>=20
> >>> nothing about linux as in never used it or as in never looked at the
>=20
> >>
>=20
> >>> technical details?
>=20
> >>
>=20
> >>>
>=20
> >>
>=20
> >>> You might want to look at what there is around for working with Xilin=
x Zynq
>=20
> >>
>=20
> >>> on MicroZed for example
>=20
> >>
>=20
> >>
>=20
> >>
>=20
> >> I have zero interest in working with the Zynq.  My understanding is th=
ey
>=20
> >>
>=20
> >> lock you to their tools for many aspects of the design, a rather
>=20
> >>
>=20
> >> autopilot thing.  It's also everything about FPGAs that I have little
>=20
> >>
>=20
> >> interest in, physically large, power hungry, expensive...
>=20
> >>
>=20
> >>
>=20
> >
>=20
> > You wouldn't have to use Zynq my point was that there seems to be many =
reasonably straight forward description on how to get linux up and running
>=20
> > i.e. download these repositories from github, set the variables to do c=
ross compiling, here's how to compile the kernel, a driver, uboot, make a d=
evicetree
>=20
> > and where to put the resulting files on an SD card to get the thing run=
ning
>=20
>=20
>=20
> Uh, why do you list all that as if it is all trivial?
>=20

what would you consider trivial? even the smallest mcu you have to figure o=
ut=20
how to compile, link, program etc.

>=20
>=20
> > The tools to use the Programmable logic is obviously Xilinx only, all F=
PGAs are
>=20
> >
>=20
> > But everything else seems to be open source stuff and gcc
>=20
>=20
>=20
> I haven't looked myself, but I was told that they require you to use=20
>=20
> Xilinx tools to load the code.  Maybe that is to load the code from the=
=20
>=20
> bitstream.
>=20

only making the bitstream, but you don't need a bit stream to run linux and=
=20
use the buildin peripherals, thought number of IOs are very limited if you =
don't use the programmable logic=20
=20
and while you have to use Xilinx tools to make a bitstream, their free tool=
s
supports everything but the very biggest Zynqs=20

>=20
> > The Zynq on a microzed is a 400pin bga, about the same as most other du=
al core ARMs, the one I have running her eon the table uses ~1W running lin=
ux
>=20
>=20
>=20
> Yes, that is large and power hungry.  I don't typically do project that=
=20
>=20
> use such large devices.
>=20

Then what do you need linux for?


-Lasse

Article: 157074
Subject: Re: NetCPU or DotNetCPU DB200 anyone?
From: rickman <gnuarm@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 22 Sep 2014 18:04:55 -0400
Links: << >>  << T >>  << A >>
On 9/22/2014 5:46 PM, langwadt@fonz.dk wrote:
> Den mandag den 22. september 2014 22.13.36 UTC+2 skrev rickman:
>> On 9/22/2014 3:52 PM, langwadt@fonz.dk wrote:
>>
>>> Den søndag den 21. september 2014 01.24.45 UTC+2 skrev rickman:
>>
>>>> On 9/20/2014 6:47 PM, langwadt@fonz.dk wrote:
>>
>>>>
>>
>>>>> Den l�rdag den 20. september 2014 03.42.21 UTC+2 skrev rickman:
>>
>>>>
>>
>>>>>> On 9/19/2014 2:53 PM, Jon Elson wrote:
>>
>>>>
>>
>>>>>>
>>
>>>>
>>
>>>>>>> rickman wrote:
>>
>>>>
>>
>>>>>>
>>
>>>>
>>
>>>>>>>
>>
>>>>
>>
>>>>>>
>>
>>>>
>>
>>>>>>>      You could probably have more fun (and
>>
>>>>
>>
>>>>>>
>>
>>>>
>>
>>>>>>>> less frustration) with a rPi or something.
>>
>>>>
>>
>>>>>>
>>
>>>>
>>
>>>>>>>>
>>
>>>>
>>
>>>>>>
>>
>>>>
>>
>>>>>>> The ultimate hacking paradise, in my opinion, is the
>>
>>>>
>>
>>>>>>
>>
>>>>
>>
>>>>>>> Beagle Bone!  LOTS of gpio pins, the only thing that is doesn't
>>
>>>>
>>
>>>>>>
>>
>>>>
>>
>>>>>>> currently support well is 3D graphics acceleration.  I've
>>
>>>>
>>
>>>>>>
>>
>>>>
>>
>>>>>>> used the earlier Beagle Boards in some one-off projects, and
>>
>>>>
>>
>>>>>>
>>
>>>>
>>
>>>>>>> now the Bone in a couple, and they are really great.  The new
>>
>>>>
>>
>>>>>>
>>
>>>>
>>
>>>>>>> Bone board has two 200 MHz (200 MIPS) 32-bit microcontrollers
>>
>>>>
>>
>>>>>>
>>
>>>>
>>
>>>>>>> in it, that can do fast I/O.  I used this in my latest project to
>>
>>>>
>>
>>>>>>
>>
>>>>
>>
>>>>>>> replace a very old PC using a DMA board.
>>
>>>>
>>
>>>>>>
>>
>>>>
>>
>>>>>>
>>
>>>>
>>
>>>>>>
>>
>>>>
>>
>>>>>> I have been wanting to get into the BBB, but I know *nothing* about
>>
>>>>
>>
>>>>>>
>>
>>>>
>>
>>>>>> Linux and I don't see nearly as much "getting started" info for the true
>>
>>>>
>>
>>>>>>
>>
>>>>
>>
>>>>>> newwbies.  I'd really like to roll an I/O card and see if I can get it
>>
>>>>
>>
>>>>>>
>>
>>>>
>>
>>>>>> to take off, but I would need support for the software.
>>
>>>>
>>
>>>>>>
>>
>>>>
>>
>>>>>>
>>
>>>>
>>
>>>>>
>>
>>>>
>>
>>>>> nothing about linux as in never used it or as in never looked at the
>>
>>>>
>>
>>>>> technical details?
>>
>>>>
>>
>>>>>
>>
>>>>
>>
>>>>> You might want to look at what there is around for working with Xilinx Zynq
>>
>>>>
>>
>>>>> on MicroZed for example
>>
>>>>
>>
>>>>
>>
>>>>
>>
>>>> I have zero interest in working with the Zynq.  My understanding is they
>>
>>>>
>>
>>>> lock you to their tools for many aspects of the design, a rather
>>
>>>>
>>
>>>> autopilot thing.  It's also everything about FPGAs that I have little
>>
>>>>
>>
>>>> interest in, physically large, power hungry, expensive...
>>
>>>>
>>
>>>>
>>
>>>
>>
>>> You wouldn't have to use Zynq my point was that there seems to be many reasonably straight forward description on how to get linux up and running
>>
>>> i.e. download these repositories from github, set the variables to do cross compiling, here's how to compile the kernel, a driver, uboot, make a devicetree
>>
>>> and where to put the resulting files on an SD card to get the thing running
>>
>>
>>
>> Uh, why do you list all that as if it is all trivial?
>>
>
> what would you consider trivial? even the smallest mcu you have to figure out
> how to compile, link, program etc.
>
>>
>>
>>> The tools to use the Programmable logic is obviously Xilinx only, all FPGAs are
>>
>>>
>>
>>> But everything else seems to be open source stuff and gcc
>>
>>
>>
>> I haven't looked myself, but I was told that they require you to use
>>
>> Xilinx tools to load the code.  Maybe that is to load the code from the
>>
>> bitstream.
>>
>
> only making the bitstream, but you don't need a bit stream to run linux and
> use the buildin peripherals, thought number of IOs are very limited if you don't use the programmable logic
>
> and while you have to use Xilinx tools to make a bitstream, their free tools
> supports everything but the very biggest Zynqs
>
>>
>>> The Zynq on a microzed is a 400pin bga, about the same as most other dual core ARMs, the one I have running her eon the table uses ~1W running linux
>>
>>
>>
>> Yes, that is large and power hungry.  I don't typically do project that
>>
>> use such large devices.
>>
>
> Then what do you need linux for?

I think we have gotten off target.  Your use of Google groups makes it 
impossible to read the thread in this message.

I think I said I was interested in the BeagleBone and that morphed into 
the Zync.  BeagleBone is a board, not a chip.  I'm looking at the 
potential for building a daughter card for it.

-- 

Rick



Site Home   Archive Home   FAQ Home   How to search the Archive   How to Navigate the Archive   
Compare FPGA features and resources   

Threads starting:
1994JulAugSepOctNovDec1994
1995JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec1995
1996JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec1996
1997JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec1997
1998JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec1998
1999JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec1999
2000JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec2000
2001JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec2001
2002JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec2002
2003JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec2003
2004JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec2004
2005JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec2005
2006JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec2006
2007JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec2007
2008JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec2008
2009JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec2009
2010JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec2010
2011JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec2011
2012JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec2012
2013JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec2013
2014JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec2014
2015JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec2015
2016JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec2016
2017JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec2017
2018JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec2018
2019JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec2019
2020JanFebMarAprMay2020

Authors:A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z

Custom Search